We’re very happy to re-introduce the newsletter’s mail subscriptions, so that you can once again receive Swift Weekly Brief in your inbox. If you haven’t yet and are interested, you can subscribe here.
Enjoy the newsletter and have a great weekend and week!
Sponsored Link
Do iOS conference in Amsterdam
On November 2 come join us for Do iOS. This is its third edition. Now fully owned and ran by the Dutch CocoaHeads Foundation. Come and join 130 fellow iOS developers for a day filled with content. Come and meet your fellow iOS developers.
There is also a University Day available on November 1.
More info and tickets on
Starter tasks
- SR-8703 [Tensorflow] Deabstraction should properly diagnose recursion
- SR-8706 [Compiler] Fix up
parseDependencyFile
to not crash on invalid YAML - SR-8707 [Compiler] Write out swiftdeps files atomically
- SR-8720 [Package Manager] Add –hide-build option to
swift run
News and community
Ted Kremenek has written an overview of the release process of Swift 5.0, including the goals and an estimated schedule.
Mike Ash wrote a blog post on the Swift.org blog, explaining how Mirror
works.
Timac wrote a blog post that measures Apple’s use of Swift in iOS 12. 66 binaries are now using Swift! 🎉
Bruno Rocha wrote a blog post on how Swift 4.2’s CaseIterable
works internally.
Commits and pull requests
Lily Vulcano opened a pull request that merges improvements from the Core Foundation version found in Mojave and iOS 12 into Swift Foundation.
Albert Aleksieiev merged a pull request that adds Android support to SwiftNIO! 💪
Michael Gottesman merged a pull request bringing performance improvements to the standard library. 🏎
Accepted proposals
SE-0221: Character Properties was acceptance status was updated.
The core team has resolved to change the status of this proposal to accepted with modification, deferring the
.isEmoji
property to a later proposal.The core team still believe it is a useful feature for the standard library, but needs more investigation that should not hold up the rest of this proposal.
In addition, the proposal will drop the source-breaking change to the existing
FixedWidthInteger.init?
. While this would be the preferred naming for a newly proposed initializer, it doesn’t clear the bar for a source-breaking change for Swift 5.
SE-0228: Fix ExpressibleByStringInterpolation
was accepted with a small amendment.
Feedback was overwhelmingly positive, and the proposal is accepted with one small amendment to provide a default implementation of
init(stringLiteral:)
for types that conform toExpressibleByStringInterpolation
.
Proposals in review
SE-0229: simd
vectors is under review.
This proposal would expose a common subset of operations on the SIMD types supported by most processors in the standard library. It is based on Apple’s
<simd/simd.h>
module, which is used throughout Apple’s platforms as the common currency type for fixed-size vectors and matrices. It is not a complete re-implementation; rather it provides the low-level support needed to import any such library, and tries to make a number of things much nicer in Swift than they are in C or C++.
SE-0230: Flatten nested optionals resulting from try?
is under review.
Swift’s
try?
statement currently makes it easy to introduce a nested optional. Nested optionals are difficult for users to reason about, and Swift tries to avoid producing them in other common cases.This document proposes giving
try?
the same optional-flattening behavior found in other common Swift features, to avoid the common occurrence of a nested optional.It’s currently quite easy to end up with a nested
Optional
type when usingtry?
. Although it is valid to construct a nested optional, it is usually not what the developer intended.
Swift Forums
Alejandro Alonso pitched a proposal to make it easier to have default implementations in protocols, without the need of an extension.
I’ve been working on implementing Default Implementation in Protocols and I have a working early implementation of the feature.
What this feature allows is that you can now declare a default implementation of a requirement from the protocol:
Peter Camb shared an issue, which is a bug in Swift that can currently not be solved through Swift iself.
I’m hitting this issue in my NSOpenSavePanelDelegate in a Sandboxed Mac app.
I need to get a reference to the sender as a Panel and set the directory.
All of my
as?
casts fail because the Sandbox uses a private subclass for these items.
This is a longstanding bug, but it looks like we don’t have a JIRA bug for it. [..] it’s very similar to SR-5475 (which is about optional properties of protocols). I don’t think we have a good workaround other than defining a little static inline function in Objective-C that will do the call for you without trying to check anything.
An alternate approach in this specific case would be to file a bug against Apple that the sender here is not an instance of
NSOpenPanel
or at leastNSSavePanel
.
Finally
Making all sorts of progress on variadic generics. 🦄